Colour. The distinctive tint caused by impurities may not be present
in reproductions.
Manufacturing
methods. Hand-blown glass usually has a pontil mark
- a rough bump under the stem - where it was cut from the pontil
rod. It may have striations or ripples in the glass and the rim
may be of uneven thickness. Later, machine-made glass doesn't have
these imperfections.
Proportions. Glass has varied in style and proportion throughout
the centuries. On old glasses, the foot is usually as wide as the
bowl. The wrong proportions may indicate a fake.
Coloured glass
Coloured drinking glasses and decanters were produced in relatively
small quantities in England during the 18th century. But 18th-century
styles were much copied in the late 19th and early 20th century
and some later versions are so convincing that even experienced
collectors can be confused. Most of the coloured glass you'll
come across dates from after 1800, when many lavishly decorated
glass objects were made both in Britain and on the Continent.
Opaline glass
At first glance the goblet above looks as if it's made from porcelain,
but it's actually an example of English opaline glass, made
in about 1850. Much opaline glass was also made in France.
Quality can vary - the best pieces are made from lead crystal
and are very heavy. A piece like this would cost at least £300.
What to look for
pieces marked by the workshops of Thomas Webb, WHB & J Richardson
and Stephens & Williams larger pieces multiple layers of
glass high-quality design, especially neoclassical figures
Cameo glass
Cameo glass is one of the more expensive types of 19th-century
coloured glass. 
This large bottle has a silver lid, so
it's worth £1,500
to £2,000. But even miniature bottles would be worth £200.
Cameo glass is multi-layered glass on which a picture has been
carved through the layers so that it stands out in relief from
the surface and the coloured layers form the contrasts of the
picture. The simplest form of cameo glass has only two layers
like the blue and clear glass vase on the left.
The word cameo actually applies to any carving in which the
picture is raised above the surrounding surface; but in the glass
world, it is only used for carving where there is more than one
coloured layer to the glass.
The surrounding glass may be cut away using hand tools, the
oldest and most skilful method; or by using a cutting wheel,
or with hydrofluoric acid (which eats away glass).
The best quality cameo glass comes from three sources:
1: Roman cameo glass made two thousand years ago by artisans
using hand tools. The famous Portland Vase is an example.
2: English cameo glass made from the mid 19th century by such
artists as John Northwood and George Woodall (their copy of the
Portland Vase is a superb example).
3: French cameo glass made in the late 19th century until the
second world war by such great artists as Emile Galle, the Daums,
and Muller Freres.
There was a small amount of cameo glass made by others, including
Steuben and Tiffany in the USA. Note that Peking cameo glass
from China predates the European production and was made from
the 18th century.
Ruby glass
Ruby glass was produced both in Bohemia and England. It was sometimes
made from tinted glass or from clear glass with a ruby stain
on the surface.
These two pieces were made in England in the mid 19th century.
The value of the piece on the left is high at £2,500 to £3,000
because of the elaborate silver gilt handles, while the less
ornate jug on the right is worth between £400 and £600.
Gold ruby glass is made by including
in the glass mixture gold chloride, a colloidal gold solution
produced by dissolving gold metal in Aqua Regia (nitric acid
and hydrochloric acid). Tin (stannic chloride) is sometimes added
in tiny amounts, and the process is both difficult and expensive.
Today's studio glassmakers can buy their gold ruby glass in rods
from specialist manufacturers. This makes it easier for them,
but even more expensive. Most gold ruby glass items made today
have a thin layer of gold ruby glass coated with clear crystal.
The Romans made gold ruby glass, and the famous Lycurgus Cup
contained both gold and silver.
Cranberry
glass
is another type of red glass made from gold,
but the colour is paler (usually a delicate pink) because there
is less gold chloride in cranberry glass than in gold ruby glass.
The secret of making red glass was lost
for many centuries, and rediscovered during the seventeenth
century in Bohemia. At the time this was a blow to the pride
and prominence of Venetian glass-makers, who had tried unsuccessfully
for years to make red glass. If you can find a copy of it,
there was a movie called "Heart
of Gold" made about a village where the secret of making
red glass had been lost.
Cut and pressed glass
Nothing makes glass sparkle more brightly than cut decoration.
Press-moulded glass, which looks like cut glass but costs less,
became popular with the demand for inexpensive glass wares.
Cut glass
Early glass was simply cut by hand in fairly shallow patterns,
but gradually patterns became deeper and designs more elaborate,
and by about 1830 mechanised wheel cutting became the norm.
Although 18th-century cut glass is becoming more popular with
collectors, it can still be good value.
If you want to collect cut glass to use on the dining table
look out for jelly, custard and sweetmeat dishes, fruit bowls
and candlesticks. Many of these are still relatively inexpensive,
especially if you buy them singly.
The handkerchief test
Plain early glass has sometimes been decorated with later engraving
to make it seem more valuable. To check the decoration is authentic,
drop a white handkerchief in the glass - old engraving will
look dark and grey against the cloth, while new engraving will
seem white and powdery. A handkerchief or white cloth is also
useful to show up the colour of the glass itself.
Later cut glass
Extensive sets of less elaborate cut glass from the early 20th
century can still be very affordable. The glasses, bowls and
plates shown at the start of the page are part of a set of
89 items made in about 1900. The whole set would cost about £250
to £350.
Irish glass
If you see a piece of glass which looks
rather lopsided the chances are it's Irish! Glasses made in
Ireland, such as this bowl, can also often be identified by
its greyish tinge and the typical shallow diamond cutting.
A piece like this would be worth about £600.
Rock crystal
Rock crystal glass is engraved lead glass
that's been cut and polished to simulate the natural facets
of rock crystal. It became popular during the late 19th century.
A rock crystal item like this would cost about £250 to £350.
Pressed glass
During the Victorian
period clear and coloured pressed glass plates were often made
to commemorate important events. This one, worth £30 to £40,
celebrates Queen Victoria's Golden Jubilee.
Cut or pressed?
Cut glass is usually far more desirable and valuable than pressed
glass, and there are several ways of identifying it:
Jacobite glasses
Glasses engraved with roses, doves and oak leaves were made in
the 18th century to show furtive allegiance to the Old Pretender
(James Edward Stuart) and the Young Pretender (Charles Edward
Stuart).
The use of engraved drinking glasses
to express political, religious, or dynastic allegiances became
increasingly popular in eighteenth-century Britain. As material
culture, such glasses offer an insight into a society transforming
itself in terms of its beliefs and outlook, and in terms of conviviality,
taste, and behavior. But there can be problems with such evidence,
and the glistening allure of beauty can easily lead the unwary
astray.
Developments in glass technology in the late seventeenth century,
particularly the use of lead glass, offered, for the first time,
a medium of unsurpassed clarity. Glass engraving--either with
a diamond point or a spinning copper wheel--became an established
industry around the main glass manufacturing centers in Britain,
and notable groups of glasses exist that are engraved with armorial
and trade devices, hunt inscriptions, and Masonic emblems, as
well as purely decorative motifs. The increasing tendency of
polite society in this period to form and join clubs also resulted
in the demand for suitably engraved glasses for use at club gatherings.
These were used to offer toasts to patrons and supporters of
the club and, frequently, insults to those the club members opposed
or disliked.
One particular cause has become intimately associated with the
engraved glasses of this period. Jacobites espoused the right
of the Stuart kings to be restored to the throne of Great Britain.
The so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688-1689 had forced the
last Stuart king, James VI of Scotland and II of England (r.
1685-1688), into exile. Taking their name from the latinized
version of James, Jacobus, the Jacobites worked tirelessly to
engineer a Stuart restoration, first for James; then for his
son, also James (1688-1766), whom they called King James VIII
of Scotland and III of England; and finally for his son, Prince
Charles Edward Stuart (P1. II), better known today as Bonnie
Prince Charlie.
Jacobite glasses are particularly collectable
but can be expensive - an especially rare one was sold in 1992
for £66,000.
Decanters
Decanters were often decorated
with engraved or gilded labels describing their contents. This
one is made from Bristol blue glass. Bristol is an area associated
with coloured decanters, although not all were made there.
Paperweights
The most sought-after paperweights were made by famous French
factories such as Baccarat, Clichy and St
Louis during the
mid-19th century. Patterns were built up from tiny slices of
differently coloured rods, set in a mould and covered in clear
glass.
Millefiori
Millefiori (from the Italian for a thousand flowers) paperweights
are so called because their canes resemble a carpet of flowers.
You can often identify the maker of a
paperweight by the type of rods it contains and the way they
are arranged. The one pictured above includes silhouettes of
a dog, a horse and a deer, which are typical of the Baccarat
factory. It's worth about £6,500
to £7,000.
Millefiori-decorated objects have
been created intermittently from the time of ancient Mesopotamia
to the present day. Bowls of fused millefiori canes are known
to have been made in ancient Rome and Alexandria, and there are
a few references to examples of millefiori work during the Renaissance.
By the eighteenth century, however, the technical knowledge for
the manufacture of millefiori was lost. It was not until the
nineteenth century that a revival of the technique appeared.
By the end of the 1830s, millefiori were manufactured successfully
in Silesia-Bohemia. Within two or three years of its rediscovery,
factories in Venice, England, and France were also producing
quantities of millefiori canes.
More about Millefiori Weights
Beware
Reproductions of antique paperweights abound. The easiest way
to tell them apart from the real thing is to feel the weight
- reproductions are significantly lighter.
Identifying marks
Baccarat paperweights
often include signed and dated canes - this one is marked B
1848. St Louis and Clichy paperweights are sometimes marked with
initials.
St Louis
Large single flower heads
were much used by the St Louis factory. Sometimes flowers were
laid on a criss-cross
lattice, known as latticinio. This weight
would cost £500 to £600.
Clichy
Clichy weights can often
be identified by the characteristic rose they contain. This one
would be worth over
£2,000
but more common types fetch from £400.
Overlay weights
Some rare weights,
such as this one by Baccarat, contain a layer of opaque glass
through which windows are cut
to reveal the design beneath. This
one would be worth £3,000
or more.
Back to Menu
History of Glass
The mysterious physical, optical
and aesthetic properties of glass have always intrigued man.
Even the most sophisticated 20th century man is amazed and bemused
by this solid, which he has been told is really a rigid uncrystallized
liquid. The product and the process used to manufacture it seem
to smack of alchemy, for glass is nothing but coarse sand and
soda ash transformed into smooth transparent forms.
According to the Roman historian Pliny, who wrote in Naturalis
Historica in 77 A.D., man first produced glass by accident about
the year 5000 B.C. Phoenician sailors feasting on a beach near
Belus in Asia Minor, could find no stones on which to place their
cooking pots; therefore, they set them on blocks of soda carried
by their ship as cargo. As the fire's heat increased, the sand
and soda turned to molten glass.
Pliny's anecdote now is considered apocryphal, but it contains
an accurate recipe for producing glass: heat plus silica and
soda ash.
Ornamental glass beads dating from 2500 B.C. have been found
in Egypt, and glass rods from even earlier have been uncovered
in Babylon. The first useful glass objects date to Egypt's 18th
dynasty, about 1500 B.C. Egyptians attached metal rods to silica
paste cores, which they dipped repeatedly into molten glass to
produce small bottles. The cores later were removed. The goblet
of Thutmose III, made about 1490 B.C. and now at New York's Metropolitan
Museum of Art, was produced in this manner.
Glassblowing, a Babylonian discovery, probably came about when
glassmakers using the core-dipped method switched to hollow metal
rods to hold silica paste cores and then discovered that molten
glass could be blown into shapes. After this discovery, which
dates to about 250 B.C., glass vessels suddenly became easy and
inexpensive to produce. Romans imported Syrian and Babylonian
glassmakers, and small bowls and bottles were selling for only
a Roman penny in 200 B.C. Pliny the Elder noted in 79 B.C. that
fine glass cups were replacing cups of precious metals as a status
symbol among the Roman rich.
Glass, however, did not replace shutters
at the windows of Roman homes. The Romans tried but failed
to cast transparent flat glass to enclose or ornament their
homes. Slabs 1/2" thick have
been excavated - including a 32 by 44-inch piece at Pompeii -
but Romans did not discover the art of grinding and polishing
cast glass to make it transparent. Instead of glass, the rich
used thin, translucent sheets of alabaster to enclose wall openings.
With the breakdown of the Roman Empire,
glassmaking technology stagnated in Europe; in fact, it almost
disappeared. True, Gothic cathedrals of the late 12th century
and later featured brilliant bits of colored glasses, complex
designs and rate and were prohibitively expensive. Even the
rich still shuttered their windows, and the Middle English
word for windows - "wind eyes" - underlined
the fact that wall openings enclosed in glass were, for all practical
purposes, nonexistent.
During the 13th and 14th centuries, glassmaking was revived
in Venice as a result of that Italian state's trade contacts
with Byzantium. Soda-Lime was developed by glassmakers of the
island or Murano in about 1450, and Venetians termed this clear,
thin glass cristallo. Despite attempts to keep their technology
secret, it soon spread north over the Alps to Germany, France,
Belgium and England.
In the Middle Ages, the Italian city of Venice assumed its role
as the glassmaking centre of the western world. The Venetian
merchant fleet ruled the Mediterranean waves and helped supply
Venice's glass craftsmen with the technical know-how of their
counterparts in Syria, and with the artistic influence of Islam.
The importance of the glass industry in Venice can be seen
not only in the number of craftsmen at work there (more than
8,000 at one point). A 1271 ordinance, a type of glass sector
statute, laid down certain protectionist measures such as a
ban on imports of foreign glass and a ban on foreign glassmakers
who wished to work in Venice: non-Venetian craftsmen were themselves
clearly sufficiently skilled to pose a threat.
Until the end of the 13th century, most glassmaking in Venice
took place in the city itself. However, the frequent fires
caused by the furnaces led the city authorities, in 1291, to
order the transfer of glassmaking to the island of Murano.
The measure also made it easier for the city to keep an eye
on what was one of its main assets, ensuring that no glassmaking
skills or secrets were exported.
In the 14th century, another important Italian glassmaking industry
developed at Altare, near Genoa. Its importance lies largely
in the fact that it was not subject to the strict statutes
of Venice as regards the exporting of glass working skills.
Thus, during the 16th century, craftsmen from Altare helped
extend the new styles and techniques of Italian glass to other
parts of Europe, particularly France.
In the second half of the 15th century, the craftsmen of Murano
started using quartz sand and potash made from sea plants to
produce particularly pure crystal. By the end of the 16th century,
3,000 of the island's 7,000 inhabitants were involved in some
way in the glassmaking industry.
Lead crystal - The development of lead crystal has been attributed
to the English glassmaker George Ravenscroft (1618-1681), who
patented his new glass in 1674. He had been commissioned to find
a substitute for the Venetian crystal produced in Murano and
based on pure quartz sand and potash. By using higher proportions
of lead oxide instead of potash, he succeeded in producing a
brilliant glass with a high refractive index which was very well
suited for deep cutting and engraving.
Advances from France - In 1688, in France, a new process was
developed for the production of plate glass, principally for
use in mirrors, whose optical qualities had, until then, left
much to be desired. The molten glass was poured onto a special
table and rolled out flat. After cooling, the plate glass was
ground on large round tables by means of rotating cast iron discs
and increasingly fine abrasive sands, and then polished using
felt disks. The result of this "plate
pouring" process was flat glass with good optical transmission
qualities. When coated on one side with a reflective, low melting
metal, high-quality mirrors could be produced.
France also took steps to promote its own glass industry and
attract glass experts from Venice; not an easy move for Venetians
keen on exporting their abilities and know-how, given the history
of discouragement of such behaviour (at one point, Venetian glass
craftsmen faced death threats if they disclosed glassmaking secrets
or took their skills abroad). The French court, for its part,
placed heavy duties on glass imports and offered Venetian glassmakers
a number of incentives: French nationality after eight years
and total exemption from taxes, to name just two.
From craft to industry - It was not until the latter stages of
the Industrial Revolution, however, that mechanical technology
for mass production and in-depth scientific research into the
relationship between the composition of glass and its physical
qualities began to appear in the industry.
Industrial Revolution - A
key figure and one of the forefathers of modern glass research
was the German scientist Otto Schott (1851-1935), who used
scientific methods to study the effects of numerous chemical
elements on the optical and thermal properties of glass. In
the field of optical glass, Schott teamed up with Ernst Abbe
(1840-1905), a professor at the University of Jena and joint
owner of the Carl Zeiss firm, to make significant technological
advances
Another major contributor in the
evolution towards mass production was Friedrich Siemens, who
invented the tank furnace. This rapidly replaced the old pot
furnace and allowed the continuous production of far greater
quantities of molten glass.
In England, where deforestation was a problem as early as the
15th century, glassmakers were required after 1615 to use coal
instead of wood in the glassmaking process. About 1675, the English
learned to add lead oxide to the basic glass formula, and the
resulting solid, heavy and durable vessels progressively replaced
the fragile glasses of Venice.
Flat glass for windows was still rare during much of the 17th
and 18th centuries. Small panes were made by blowing a large
glob of glass, removing it from the blowing iron and then rotating
the glass quickly so it would spread and flatten. Such glass
had a dimple in its center, many air bubbles and a pattern of
concentric circles, but it was transparent and effective in keeping
out the weather. At the end of the 17th century, the French learned
how to grind and polish cast glass to produce plate glass, but
only the rich could afford it.
During the 1800s, glass technology improved rapidly. A hand-operated
split mold developed in 1821 that ended the age of blowing individual
bottles, glasses and flasks. A semi-automatic bottle machine
perfected 50 years later mass-produced bottles and turned them
into the everyday miracle they are today.
Great strides were made in the manufacture
of flat glass during the 19th century. Compressed air technology
led to flatter, better glass panes. Controlled amounts of air
were used to blow a large glass cylinder, which was slit lengthwise,
reheated and allowed to flatten under its own weight. Large,
relatively inexpensive lites of glass were produced in this
manner. As a result of such technological advances, window
areas that required 18 to 24 panes to enclose in 1730 could
be increased dramatically and glass prices dropped by the 1860s,
glass-enclosed "wind eyes" were
commonplace in the humblest homes.
Plate glass, that wickedly expensive French product, also became
commonplace by the end of the 19th century. Water power, then
steam and then electricity made the grinding and polishing of
heavy glass plates faster and easier. By the 1860s, smart stores
and office buildings in Europe and North America glistened with
plate glass. France, Belgium and Germany monopolized the production
of the product until 1883, when the Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company
became the first successful manufacturer of the product in the
United States. By 1895, the company could produce 20 million
square feet of plate glass a year, and imports from Europe fell
sharply.
With the 20th century came an era of revolutionary technology.
Machines were developed, improved and perfected to produce endless
ribbons of sheet (window) glass, to produce plate glass polished
and ground simultaneously on both sides and to produce float
glass on a bed of molten tin. Also developed were processes to
strengthen glass through thermal and chemical tempering, to add
tints to glass for reduced heat transmission and glare and to
coat glass with transparent metal and metal oxide films that
reflected heat or conducted electricity. And products marrying
these processes and developments were created to help make life
more convenient, more comfortable, safer and more beautiful.
In retrospect, the romance of glass is not an Egyptian producing
a bottle for a Pharoah or window glass being made from a cylinder,
a pane at a time, in a one-man glass house. The true romance
of glass is the story of the reasonable cost for use in architecture,
transportation, industry, science and the home. Billions of people
now benefit because technology has made glass a versatile, easy-to-use
miracle.
A Short History of 18thC Glass
JULIUS
KAPLAN
Art, culture, popular libations,
politics, and even treason are all to be found depicted on English
glassware.
The well-appointed 18th-century American household was furnished
for the most part with products made in America. Our affluent
colonial ancestors dined at magnificent mahogany tables from
New York, sat on elegant Chippendale chairs from Philadelphia,
and carved and ate their turkey with cutlery and silverware from
Massachusetts. However, when it came to finding glasses to drink
from, Americans in those days still had to look back principally
to Mother England. Proper stemware was not produced in this country
until late in the century.
Fine glass was produced in
substantial amounts in England during the entire 18th century.
It was usually made from a lead crystal, then referred to as “flint” glass. George Ravenscroft,
a glass maker in London, introduced the process in 1676 by mixing
lead oxide and potash into a silica batch. The flint glass that
resulted was acclaimed almost immediately for its beauty and
clarity. Unfortunately, however, Ravenscroft’s early output
had a tendency to “crizzle,” leaving an internal
network of lines that eventually caused a breakdown of the surface
of the glass. But this defect was soon corrected and, by the
1680s, Ravenscroft and others were consistently producing clear,
brilliant, uncrizzled glass.
English flint glass tended
to be heavier, more stable, and more refractive than the unleaded “soda” glass then in
general use on the Continent. During the Georgian period, flint
glass became the predominant material in drinking-glass production
throughout England and the end products were greatly appreciated
by connoisseurs. Flint glass is easily distinguished from soda
glass. Besides being heavier in weight, it is also more resonant.
It rings beautifully when tapped lightly with a fork, while soda
glass gives off a dull thud. Leaded glass also is distinguishable
by a faint grayish tinge. Both flint glass and high-quality German
and Venetian soda glass sought to imitate the appearance of rock
crystal, which is why we now use the word “crystal” for
fine glassware.
Drinking glasses in those
days came in many different sizes and shapes. They often had
bowls, which had a small capacity by today’s standards,
two ounces or less. Others were enormous, and were probably
used for beer or as ceremonial glasses. Whatever the size,
Georgian glasses tended to be well designed, with harmonious
dimensions.
English glassware in the
18th century reflected the rise of a consumer culture in England.
The fashion-conscious purchaser sought an assortment of different
styles and shapes for each drink served. Among the popular
shapes were glasses for ale, cordials, various kinds of wine,
and “ratafias,” an
almond-based drink similar to a cordial. There were tumblers
and even special toastmaster glasses. The latter had thick bowls
that held a deceptively small quantity of drink, thus enabling
the toastmaster to propose numerous toasts and still make it
home under his own power.
By the middle of the 18th
century, many items throughout the home were being made of
glass. Household glassware included candlesticks, taper sticks,
salvers, sweetmeat glasses, and dessert glasses for jellies,
syllabubs, and possets. Decanters, in this hard-drinking era,
ranged in size from a quarter-bottle capacity to a “Methuselah” capable
of holding eight full bottles. Decanters were collected for their
form, size, and style of decoration. Rarities included enameled
decanters from the workshop of the Beilby family in Newcastle-upon-Tyne
and gilded examples from James Giles’ decorating establishment
in London during the 1760s. Later, manufacturers and dealers
successfully promoted the use of a distinctive decanter for each
type of beverage. It became fashionable to label decanters to
indicate their contents, e.g., port, sherry, madeira, claret, “cyder,” and
even beer and ale, which, in this period, were powerful beverages
more accurately described as “barley wine.”
CHANGING TASTES
The design of Georgian glass
reflected not only the tastes of the times—the lightness of rococo superseding the heavier
baroque style and motifs—but also the impact of excise
tax laws. For example, in 1745 England began to tax glass on
the basis of weight, a tax imposed on the manufacturer. This
impelled glass manufacturers to find ways to lighten their product.
One method was the elimination of the “folded foot.” Prior
to 1745, Georgian glasses generally had been made with the base,
or foot, reinforced with an extra fold or layer of metal to protect
the foot from chipping. Without this reinforced base, post-1745
glasses were less expensive to make, but more vulnerable to being
damaged.
One example of an early drinking
glass was the baluster. The earliest of these dated back to
the reign of William III and Mary, circa 1690, but the best
were produced mostly during the reign of Queen Anne (1701-1716).
The baluster took its name from the architectural form for
the short pillar, although, in the case of the glass, the shape
was usually inverted. A wide variety of stem patterns, or “knops,” evolved
in the broad field of baluster glasses. If produced by a good
maker, knops shaped as acorns, mushrooms, or cylinders are
eagerly sought by collectors today. Perhaps rarest of all,
the plain ovoid or egg-shaped knop is highly desirable among
collectors. An air bubble was often incorporated in the knop
of balusters.
With the advent of the Hanoverian
monarchy in 1714, English makers began producing glasses similar
to the styles being made in Germany. These glasses emerged
during the reign of George I and may well reflect the influence
of his court. Typically, these glasses possessed a molded pedestal
stem sometimes referred to as a “Silesian” stem. A very small number incorporate
the motto “God Save King George” on the stem. The
pedestals usually had six or eight sides, although some early
four-sided ones were also made. Others were molded with diamonds
or stars on the points of the shoulders. The feet are usually
folded, as were the feet of baluster glasses. The Silesian stem
also was found on candlesticks and sweetmeat glasses.
During the second quarter
of the century, glass makers in England began to realize that
the air bubble or “tear” in
baluster glasses could be manipulated to be a central decorative
feature in the stem. These manipulations took elaborate and intricate
forms, and often resulted in glasses of great beauty and brilliance.
Many varieties of air twists were created. They were incorporated
in straight-stemmed glasses, as well as in glasses with knops.
By mid-century, multi-spiral, air twist stems were extremely
popular.
Figure 1. This Beilby wineglass (circa 1765-70) features a double-series
opaque-twist stem.
Before long,
the air twist was overtaken in popularity by glasses with an
opaque twist stem (see Figure 1). Instead of manipulating the
air bubble, manufacturers placed rods of white enamel around
the inside of a cylindrical mold. The mold was then filled
with molten glass, which, after cooling and reheating, could
be twisted to create “cotton twists” of elaborate and intricate
design. Opaque twist stems were used in most styles of drinking
glasses, both small and large, as well as in candlesticks and
sweetmeat glasses.
Around 1760, an especially attractive variation of the twist-stemmed
glass emerged with the addition of color. In lieu of rods of
white enamel, the glass maker now substituted, most commonly,
red, green, and blue rods. These were frequently intertwined
with opaque white twists, resulting in complex and very beautiful
designs. Today, color twist glasses from this era are far rarer
than air or opaque twist glasses. Those with brown and turquoise
twists are especially rare. Yellows, though also rare, are not
as difficult to find. The color twist was sometimes mixed with
an air twist. Another attractive combination, though rare, is
a color twist combined with both an air twist and an opaque twist.
The rarest of the color twists, however, has a stem with a single
color and neither an opaque nor an air twist.
In 1777, taxes once again
played an important role in the development of English glassware.
Parliament’s approval of the Excise
Act of 1777 doubled the tax rate on glass produced in England,
but from 1780 onward exempted glass produced in Ireland. As a
result, the Irish cut-glass industry was born. One of the early
producers there was the now internationally famous Waterford
manufactory. Most Irish cut glass was made for export to England
and America.
The bowls of Georgian glasses
were frequently decorated with engraved images. This was accomplished
by using either a “diamond
point” or, more commonly, an engraving wheel. Engraving
on glass with a sharp instrument had been practiced by the Romans.
Indeed, Egyptian antecedents go back as far as the 14th century,
B.C., and there are references to engraved Venetian glass dating
from the 16th century. By 1570, the technique had spread to England,
where it was employed by both English and Dutch engravers.
The subjects of the engravings varied. Wine glasses often were
decorated with representations of vines and grapes, ale glasses
with barley and hops, and cider glasses with apple trees and
perhaps the word CYDER. Other common 18th-century subjects included
flowers and plants, busts of famous and not-so-famous persons,
armorial seals of aristocratic families, hunting scenes, political
slogans, animals, flags, and ships.
Bristol, famed for its glass
as well as its shipbuilding, was a major center for glasses
engraved with warships. The production of “privateer” glasses began in the late 1750s. The
bowls were decorated with wheel-engraved images of the specific
ships then being commissioned in Bristol for use by the English
in the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763). Most of these “privateers” had
bucket-shaped bowls.
GLASSES AND POLITICS
Perhaps the most famous,
and controversial, of English engraved glassware is Jacobite
glass: glassware that overtly or covertly supported the Stuart
cause in England’s “Glorious
Revolution” of 1688-1689. This period of strife has its
origins in 1669, when James, the son of Charles I of England,
converted to Catholicism. In 1685, he ascended the throne as
King James II and immediately started to convert his Roman Catholic
faith into royal policy. This policy greatly alarmed the Protestants
of England who, three years later, forced the King to flee for
his life to France, replacing him with the Protestant monarchy
of William III of Orange and his wife, Mary, James II’s
daughter.
James II spent the rest of
his days attempting to recapture the throne, as did his son,
James Edward Stuart, and grandson, Charles Edward Stuart. They
failed, despite substantial, if often furtive, support from
the “Jacobites” who championed
their cause. Jacobite societies had to be secret since they were
officially banned. Nevertheless, they met frequently and, over
a bowl of water, toasted “the King,” often using
glasses engraved with Jacobite symbols. The toast was well understood
by the members as a tribute to the “King over the sea,” or
James III, as James Edward Stuart styled himself.
The most common symbol of
Jacobite support on glassware is the rose. The flower is depicted
fully open and normally has two closed buds on the stem. The
open flower is believed to represent the throne of England,
and the two buds are interpreted to be the two Stuart sons
of James III—Prince Charles Edward
and Prince Henry the Cardinal Duke of York.
In addition to the symbolic
flowers, Jacobite glasses frequently have words engraved on
them: Fiat (meaning “let it be” or “let
it come to pass”) or Redeat, Redi, or Revirescit (suggesting
hope that the Prince will return). The bowls of some Jacobite
glasses bear a likeness of the grandson of James II, Charles
Edward Stuart, known as the Young Pretender or Bonnie Prince
Charlie. But the most famous, as well as the earliest, Jacobite
glasses are the “Amen” glasses. There are fewer than
40 known examples. Two to four verses of the Jacobite hymn and
the word Amen are engraved in diamond point on their bowls.
Jacobite glasses have long been a favorite with collectors.
The popularity of Jacobite glasses, in fact, drove prices so
high that forgers were encouraged to produce copies. The forgeries
were principally done in the 19th and 20th centuries on genuine
Georgian glass. As a consequence, serious doubt has been cast
on the authenticity of many putative Jacobite glasses.
Predictably, perhaps, the Protestant supporters of King William
III and Queen Mary responded to the popularity of Jacobite glasses
with engraved glassware of their own. The Protestant glasses
usually depict an equestrian figure of William and also were
frequently copied by forgers. When George I became king in 1714,
thereby establishing the House of Hanover on the British throne,
engraved glasses were produced that depicted a Hanoverian white
horse together with a white heraldic rose.
DUTCH INFLUENCES
William of Orange was not the only Dutch connection to English
glass. Dutch engravers worked on many English and English-style
glasses. They tended to be more skilled than their English counterparts,
which is why many English glasses were sent to Holland for engraving.
Some 18th-century English glass makers may even have set up factories
in the Netherlands and Norway to produce English-style flint
glass. Many 18th-century glasses formerly thought to be of English
origin are now thought by many experts to be of Dutch or Belgian
origin.
One type of glass engraving
perfected in Holland during the 18th century was diamond stippling,
the use of pointillist techniques to create images on glass.
The originator of stippling was Anna Roemers, who lived in
Leiden in the second quarter of the 17th century. Stipple-engravers
created images by making innumerable tiny dots on the bowl
of the glass. Darker areas were made with dots spaced farther
apart, and lighter areas with the dots closer together. The
result was an image of incredible delicacy. Interestingly,
the image can hardly be seen unless light is cast from above
on the edge of the glass. When lighted in that way, the image
is said to have been “breathed upon.”
Figure 2. Stipple engraving (circa 1780) by David Wolff featuring
a prancing horse.
Roemers’ stippling technique was taken up early in the
18th century by Frans Greenwood of Amsterdam (1680-1763), a gifted
amateur who created beautiful images on glass. There are about
50 recorded glasses by Greenwood. Most of the stipple-engravers
were, like Greenwood, amateurs. There were, however, at least
two who were probably professionals and who were great masters,
in any case: David Wolff (1732-1798); and an anonymous pointillist
nicknamed “Alias” by F.G.A.M. Smit, the author of
an important 20th century catalogue raisonné of Dutch
stippled glass. The craftsmanship of both “Alias” and
Wolff was immaculate (see Figure 2). Both frequently depicted
children, often together with inscriptions dealing with love,
friendship, and liberty. Wolff also stipple-engraved portraits
of aristocratic personages and armorials, frequently of the House
of Orange. One of the most intricate and beautiful of Wolff’s
glasses is the “Personification of Amsterdam,” depicting
Asia and Africa paying obeisance to Amsterdam. Another important
glass by Wolff pictures a house in a landscape on which is inscribed
in a banderole, “VRYHEIDS LUST” (“yearning
for freedom”).
No discussion of Dutch engravings
on English or English-style glasses can be complete without
mention of two masters of wheel-engraved glass, the Brothers
Sang—Jacob Sang and Simon Jacob Sang.
The Sangs originated in Brunswick, Germany, and worked in Amsterdam.
An advertisement for the wares of Jacob Sang appeared in an Amsterdam
newspaper in 1753. It noted that he engraved on English-style
glass and that the subjects of his engraving included portraits,
armorials, classical subjects, figures of all sorts, names, and
inscriptions, and decorative designs of the newest fashions.
Several Sang glasses, signed and dated, exist today.
THE ARTISTRY OF WILLIAM BEILBY
Figure 3. The bowl of this Beilby wineglass (circa 1767-70)
depicts the coat of arms of Wilhem V, Prince of Orange, and his
bride, Princess Frederika Sophia Wilhelmina.
Rather than being engraved, some Georgian glasses were beautifully
decorated with paintings, principally by an artist named William
Beilby, sometimes with the assistance of his sister, Mary, and
his brother Ralph. They produced their works in Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
principally during the 1760s. William Beilby learned enameling
and painting during the 1750s while apprenticed to a Birmingham
artist named John Haseldine. In 1761, William discovered how
to fire his enamel paintings onto glass so that they virtually
fused with the glass. We know much of this from the diaries of
Thomas Bewick, a highly regarded artist, who for several years
was an apprentice in the Beilby atelier.
The most famous Beilby glasses
are families’ coats of
arms and other armorials, which often were painted in bright
colors. These include royal armorials for the Dutch and English
crowns, as well as armorials for important English families (see
Figure 3). A few were signed with the name of W. Beilby or Beilby
Jr. Other Beilby glass was “signed” with a butterfly,
as the American artist James Abbott McNeill Whistler did many
years later in his paintings and drawings.
Figure 4. Crafted by James Giles, this blue decanter (circa
1760- 70) has elaborate gilt birds among foliage.
One of the more interesting Beilby glasses is a very handsome
and tall goblet known as the Standard of Hesleyside. It carries
with it an interesting story. In 1763, Edward Charlton of Hesleyside
visited the Beilby workshop in Newcastle. Impressed with the
quality of the workmanship he saw, Charlton commissioned William
Beilby to decorate a glass that would hold a full bottle of claret.
Beilby designed a goblet with a deep, round funnel bowl connected
to an additional globular bowl beneath it. One side of the glass
bears the inscription The Standard of Hesleyside. On the reverse
side is the Charlton family arms in color with the inscription
Edward Charlton Esqv. 1763. According to J. Rush, who wrote about
the Beilby artistry in 1987, it became “the custom and
a challenge . . . to gulp the contents [of this two-bowl glass]
down without taking a breath,” and drinking a full bottle
of Bordeaux wine in this fashion became known as “Sinking
the Standard.” Unfortunately, this unique glass was damaged
when Charlton’s drunken butler mishandled it. History does
not record whether the butler himself had tried to “Sink
the Standard.”
In addition to armorials, the Beilbys painted hunting and fishing
scenes, pastoral scenes, classical ruins, exotic birds, Chinese
pavilions, and beehives. Other glasses had somewhat more abstract
vine-scroll and hop-and-barley motifs. In still others, the white
enamel is highlighted with bluish or pink tones. The rim of the
glass is frequently gilded. Among the most treasured of all Beilby
glasses are those fashioned by William Beilby to commemorate
the birth of the Prince of Wales on August 4, 1762. They are
executed in full heraldic color, with mantling painted in white
enamel and shadowing in other colors. Among the rarest Beilbys
are a sweetmeat glass and a sugar bowl.
Another famous painter who
decorated glass was James Giles (and his atelier). Giles gilded
a variety of glass objects but was best known for his decanters,
glasses, and bottles featuring portrayals of exotic birds amid
slender, feathery trees (see Figure 4). Giles also did vine
trails and hop-and-barley motifs, and later added bucranium
(stag’s head) designs to his
repertoire. Although James Giles’ decoration of glass was
highly regarded, his atelier was best known for its decoration
of colored china, principally from Worcester.
Isaac Jacobs of Bristol was
yet another skilled craftsman who gilded on blue (and opaque
white) glass. He is perhaps best known for his blue bowls with
key-fret borders, which were often signed. The bowls were brought
out at the end of a meal and were used “for
rinsing hands and mouth,” according to one account of the
times.
One final type of 18th-century
English glassware of interest is the “rummer,” a corruption of the Dutch word “Roemer.” This
type of green-colored glass was used to drink German white wines
(“Hock” or “Rhenish” wine, as they were
called in Georgian times). The original Roemer was normally green
with a prunted stem (the shape of a sliced raspberry) and a cup-shaped
bowl. The Georgian version omitted the prunts and gadrooning
(an abstract design), and took on the shape and design of the
clear glass being produced at the time. A few of these green
glasses had air twist stems and, less frequently, opaque twist
stems. Very few had a green bowl and foot, with a clear opaque
twist stem. Less than a dozen such glasses have survived. In
general, green glass is much rarer than clear flint glass, probably
reflecting a relative lack of interest by 18th-century imbibers
in drinking Hock. Green decanters are even more rare. One of
the rarest colored English drinking glasses of the 18th century
is a glass with a blue bowl and foot, and a clear opaque twist
stem.
PRESERVING THE TREASURES
Many of these works of art
are greatly prized today by collectors and museums. They have
gone up in value, though perhaps not as aggressively as Impressionist
paintings. For a fine Georgian glass, one must count on paying
anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000—and
beyond for very rare and beautiful examples.
A number of museums in the
United States— including the
Corning Museum of Glass in Corning, New York; the Toledo Museum
in Toledo, Ohio; and the Philadelphia Museum—have excellent
collections of English 18th-century glass. In addition, there
are important private American collections, several of which
are in the Washington-Baltimore area.
Back to Menu